Skip to main content
Display Image
Published on: April 28, 2025 | 5 minute read | by Krisa Cortez

Artificial intelligence went from being a buzzword to a capital expense this 2025. From training large language models to running real-time fraud detection or powering intelligent edge devices, AI is now woven into the fabric of business. But how do you actually compare the firepower behind the scenes? That’s where MLPerf and AI benchmarking steps in.

Imagine trying to buy a car with no 0-60 mph time, no miles per gallon, and no crash test ratings. That was the AI hardware space until MLPerf came along. Created by MLCommons, a consortium of industry leaders including Intel, NVIDIA, Google, and Microsoft, MLPerf is the AI benchmarking suite for AI systems nowadays. It’s where vendors prove what their chips can really do under pressure, and not just in theory.

For IT buyers, cloud architects, and data center managers, MLPerf has been proven helpful as it made things less about bragging rights and more about decision-making clarity. It's the impartial referee in the AI hardware arena that just so happened to have dropped another set of results. And at the center of the latest wave? Intel.

Breaking Down MLPerf: What It Measures and Why It Matters

Let’s get grounded in what MLPerf actually tests. There are two primary categories in its AI benchmarking:

1. Training Benchmarks

These measure how fast a system can teach an AI model from scratch. We're talking about workloads like:

  • Image classification (ResNet)

  • Language modeling (BERT)

  • Object detection (SSD)

  • Recommendation systems (DLRM)

  • Medical imaging (3D U-Net)

In the training world, compute intensity is extreme. It’s a test of raw horsepower, memory bandwidth, and interconnect magic.

2. Inference Benchmarks

These evaluate how quickly and efficiently a system can take a trained model and apply it. For example, detecting objects in a camera feed or interpreting a voice command. This is where energy efficiency, latency, and throughput really shine.

Both types are run on a wide range of systems: CPUs, GPUs, accelerators, and mixed environments. MLPerf then publishes apples-to-apples comparisons.

Intel's MLPerf Moment: Playing Smart, Not Just Fast

Intel recently released results and commentary showcasing how their Gaudi2 AI accelerators and Xeon CPUs performed in the latest MLPerf round. And here’s the twist: while they didn’t claim to beat NVIDIA at raw training speed, they positioned themselves as the more efficient, cost-effective, and open alternative.

"AI isn't just about how fast you go—it's about how far your budget gets you," Intel seems to be saying.

Their playbook:

  • Gaudi2 is tuned for performance-per-dollar and performance-per-watt.

  • Xeon CPUs are optimized for inference at scale.

  • They're committed to open ecosystems (PyTorch, TensorFlow, etc.).

Intel is targeting enterprise buyers who need scalability without blowing their power bill or vendor lock-in. If you're running hybrid cloud setups or need to serve a lot of inference requests at the edge, Intel's narrative is an attractive prospect indeed.

Why MLPerf Is a Game-Changer for Buyers

The challenge for years has been navigating AI marketing fluff. Vendor whitepapers all say their chips are faster, better, greener. MLPerf cuts through that:

  • Standardized Testing: Every vendor runs the same workloads, under the same rules.

  • Real-World Models: No synthetic tests. These are the tasks real businesses care about.

  • Transparent Submissions: Results are vetted, published, and publicly available.

For buyers, this means you can compare:

  • Inference latency across hardware

  • Training speed per system

  • Power efficiency across workloads

  • Cost-performance metrics

And you don’t have to trust vendor spin.

Why Now? And Why Should Enterprises Care?

The timing matters. As AI enters mainstream operations across industries, there’s growing pressure to:

  • Optimize costs

  • Scale sustainably

  • Make strategic long-term hardware investments

MLPerf gives enterprises a compass. Whether you’re building an internal LLM platform or deploying smart cameras on your warehouse floor, these benchmarks help map your performance needs to the right tech.

At Unix Surplus, we’re seeing this conversation show up in purchasing more than ever. Customers aren’t just asking for "fast servers". They want to know how their investment performs under real AI tasks. MLPerf is becoming part of the buyer’s checklist.

The Strategic Stakes: Not Just a Benchmark, a Battlefield

Intel's emphasis on MLPerf underscores a broader strategic aim, with them not trying to be NVIDIA. They’re carving out a new value proposition all on their own:

  • More accessible AI performance

  • Lower energy draw

  • Support for open ecosystems

In a world where AI hardware can no longer be one-size-fits-all, Intel is offering an alternative story. You can compete in AI without needing the fastest GPU in the room, especially if your workloads align.

It makes this an easy data center decision, one that works for your business. Do you optimize for performance at any cost, or for efficient scalability? Do you want vendor diversity? Are you constrained by space, power, or cooling?

MLPerf forces those questions into the light.

What to Expect Next: The Competition Isn’t Sitting Still

Of course, the story doesn’t stop here. MLPerf is just the arena. And Intel isn’t the only contender flexing its silicon.

Supermicro, in partnership with NVIDIA, is already making its own MLPerf splash, touting record-setting performance with its new HGX B200 systems based on NVIDIA’s next-gen Blackwell architecture. It’s a power move, and it deserves a deep dive of its own.

Stay tuned for our next article, where we break down how Supermicro and NVIDIA are taking MLPerf AI benchmarking in a different direction. One that’s all about dominance, density, and data center firepower.

Final Thought: MLPerf as Due Diligence? Yes.

Whether you’re refreshing AI infrastructure or dipping your toe in for the first time, MLPerf is the closest thing the industry has to a truth serum. And in 2025, that clarity is gold and AI benchmarking has become a must.

At Unix Surplus, we keep an eye on these benchmark battles so you don’t have to. Because beneath every flashy press release lies a simple question: what’s right for your workloads, your goals, and your bottom line?

Sometimes the answer isn’t speed. Sometimes it’s strategy.

And sometimes, it starts with a benchmark, in this case, the AI benchmark.


Recommended Resources for Reading:

Curt_Hopkins. (2020). MLCommonsTM for Machine Learning Benchmarking Launches with ...

44. (2024). MLPerf Power: Benchmarking the Energy Efficiency of Machine ...

Intel. (2024). Intel Gaudi Enables a Lower Cost Alternative for AI Compute and ...

MLCommons. (2024). Announcing the New MLPerf Client Working Group - MLCommons.

New MLPerf Training v4.1 Benchmarks Highlight Industry’s Focus on ... (2024).

Jeremy Schultz (2025) What is MLPerf? Understanding AI’s Top Benchmark | intel newsroom

Stephen Foskett. (2025). How MLPerf Proves AI Client and Storage Performance - LinkedIn.

Steph Bairey. (2025). What is MLPerf? Understanding AI’s Top Benchmark - Intel Newsroom.

Aharon Etengoff. (2025). What are the different MLPerf benchmarks from MLCommons?

Jaime Hampton. (2025). MLPerf v5.0 Reflects the Shift Toward Reasoning in AI Inference.

Steph Bairey. (2025). Intel Xeon Remains Only Server CPU on MLPerf

Robert Enderle. (2025). AMD’s Latest MLPerf Results: A Landmark Achievement in AI ...

Supermicro’s NVIDIA B200 systems show performance gains on ... (2025).

Douglas C Youvan (n.d.) Dominance and Innovation: Nvidia's Role in Advancing AI Benchmarks through MLPerf | ResearchGate

Benchmark MLPerf Training | MLCommons Version 2.0 Results. (n.d.).